Education has always been associated with opportunities that one can access when he/she possesses the knowledge and skills required for performing certain tasks or taking on the authority. Education can be compared with the investment that will yield interest during the entire life course. Subsequently, better investment accounts for higher dividends. Anyon points out that the main difference between teaching in working class and upper class schools is educational philosophies and teaching techniques. Therefore, all schools should foster greater prosperity and equality by adopting advanced methods of teaching that prepare pupils for success and benefit society as a whole.
It seems that inequality in approach to education is the core issue that explains differences in education. The study by Anyon is not the only research that points out to evidence about inequality in educational practices. Benokraitis corroborates Anyon’s finding and claims that different economic backgrounds account for different academic outcomes and a person’s position on a labor market. It appears that the governmental and educational authorities failed to provide equal educational opportunities for the children that come from different social backgrounds.
According to Anyon, lack of quality education and lower social status and poverty are interconnected. Gans argued that poorly educated people benefit society. For example, society needs someone to do low-paying and ‘dirty’ work. However, be the claims about good use of poverty correct, one could claim that larger numbers of poor make the state prosperous. Also, historical evidence does not confirm this argument. Such European states as Finland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden and Switzerland built strong economies, eliminated poverty and people of these countries do not feel deprived of having uneducated and poor around. It stands to reason that society as a whole will benefit if a greater number of its citizens will be better educated.
Majority of individuals are aware of the fact that the place where they currently live is the result of the total sum of choices they have made. However, different dynamics apply to children. Their future is relevant to education decisions and influences of parents, teachers, and caregivers. Therefore, parents can consciously choose educational path (school) for their children that will equip them with leadership skills for future successes and maintaining high social status. Moreover, teachers can relatively easily apply advanced teaching methods and derive greater satisfaction from knowing that they do a better job teaching their students to succeed.
Since the main difference between teaching in working class and upper class schools is in teaching methods and educational philosophies, all schools should adopt advanced methods of teaching. It will help to prepare pupils for success, promote equality, and benefit society as a whole.
This material was provided by Stacy Colins, who is talented writer at write my discussion board post
https://specialessays.com/write-my-discussion-board-post service
