  |
Message |
DAMAMA
ubw newbie
Joined: Dec 08, 2005
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:25 pm |
 |
|
| Back to top |
 |
|
unclejohnny
ubw newbie
Joined: Dec 15, 2004
Posts: 39
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 1:46 pm |
|
Honeybear
I like your arrangment, not too hurried, laidback but still gutsy. Great voice. Also like the dreamy guitar hammer on/off, very simple but effective. The only thing I would change is the distorted guitar part that comes in with the chorus. I personaly prefer a natural heavy overdrive sound. But hey thats just me.
Cold suzy
Production not as interesting as Honeybear, but a good tune nonetheless. Tight playing and some very skillfull musicianship. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
overgrowneden
ubw rookie
Joined: Dec 16, 2004
Location: Turkey/Istanbul
Posts: 104
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 2:50 pm |
|
hey
nice works.I agree with unclejohnny about the distored part in the chorus.Maybe you could consider recording vocals multiple and using comp.Just a suggestion.Keep up the good work. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guitarman152
ubw luminary
Joined: Aug 03, 2005
Location: Hamden, Ct. . . .USA
Posts: 719
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 12, 2005 4:09 pm |
|
hey eric, "honeybear" sounds good to me, I like the distorted part leading into the chorus, but I think overgrowneden has a point with doubling up the vocals and adding compression, to give it more of a kick vocally for the chorus. . . .catchy tune . . . good job!
Peace,
Erick . . . .
check out I believe and let me know what you think . . . . . Play I Believe . . .click me |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DAMAMA
ubw newbie
Joined: Dec 08, 2005
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 16, 2005 5:43 pm |
|
Do you mean split/pan the track to double it up.. or do you mean add more vocals to the chorus? If I'm not mistaken, the vocals are already panned and compressed but that track was recorded a while ago with an sm57 before we really knew how to use Adobe Audition.. I suppose it couldnt hurt to re-record the chorus with the newer mics. Thanks for your input. We will get to work on that.
Eric |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Soulfish
ubw luminary
Joined: Nov 07, 2004
Location: Brighton
Posts: 704
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 17, 2005 7:56 am |
|
I like the opening and acoustic guitar, but the electric is a little too testosterone for me - the light/subtle touch you establish is wiped away with the power chord. I reckon you could riff it and come up with a more choppy approach to the guitars on the chorus. But overall the melody, structure, performance is tight. Liked it.
Sf. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
DAMAMA
ubw newbie
Joined: Dec 08, 2005
Posts: 12
|
| Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2005 12:32 am |
|
Basicly the common respond concerns the chorus dirty guitar part.. and i agree with everyone. Originally that chorus was played with alot less distortion.. and more "non-power chord" style guitar. I think we will go back to doing it that way.. that track was recorded a while ago ..we always learn from our mistakes.. thanks for the input its greatly appreciated.
Eric |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
haggisthebadger
ubw rookie
Joined: Jul 17, 2005
Location: NORWICH ENGLAND
Posts: 93
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:28 pm |
|
yeah... had a little listen
sounds cool to me... good arrangement, good lyrics and generaly a good tune!
best regards
Haggisthebadger |
|
|
| Back to top |
 |
|
Seansean
ubw newbie
Joined: Dec 23, 2005
Location: Virginia
Posts: 10
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 23, 2005 2:04 pm |
|
Wow, that song is well put together and I like all of the ideas. The transitions are a little sloppy and the breakdown is less impressive than the rest of the song. With that being said, you have obvious raw talent and I would definately want to see your band play. |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
