Signup | Login  | Free Blog 

who can't HI-FI?

 Music Forums Music who can't HI-FI?  
Post new topicReply to topic Message
ImL
moderator



Joined: Jun 25, 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1885

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 11:16 am Reply with quote

Just curious as to how many are on dial up modem.

$50 added to the bill a month is a tad expensive I feel for broad-band over here. Is this normal pricing?

If there's enough of us, we could form a club and cry together. then laugh, then cry and laugh again.

There are a heap of artists here whose lofi is awesome quality in all genres. I'd love to know why. Sample rate? Mastering? There is a fine line between them sometimes and any comments regarding how would be mmmmost welcome.. Very Happy
Back to top View user's profileSend e-mail
Brooksy
ubw screen dweller
ubw screen dweller



Joined: Oct 08, 2004
Location: The Wastelands
Posts: 1899

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 11:22 am Reply with quote

I'm on broadband Laughing Laughing

There should be more lo-fi though, cause even broadband runs slow at times. Which is why I try and upload everything in lo-fi for everyone to make it easier...

LO-FI people.....more plays, expand the fan base...it's not a poor man's upload stream...it's vital to all
Back to top View user's profile
minusme
Site Admin



Joined: Jan 25, 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 3648

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 11:22 am Reply with quote

I think the difference in lo-fi is attributable to the quality of the master and the bit-rate..

If the master is good, then even 24kpbs will sound good, if not, then 48kbps is probably better...

Ron
Back to top View user's profileSend e-mail
rechat
moderator



Joined: Feb 06, 2004
Location: California
Posts: 508

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 12:43 pm Reply with quote

I only pay $20 a month for broadband.
Back to top View user's profile
Brooksy
ubw screen dweller
ubw screen dweller



Joined: Oct 08, 2004
Location: The Wastelands
Posts: 1899

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 12:44 pm Reply with quote

Hell that's less than we pay in the UK...we pay about $31....That's it....get me a room at the Holiday Inn Laughing
Back to top View user's profile
mittins
ubw luminary
ubw luminary



Joined: Nov 05, 2004
Location: erie,pa
Posts: 781

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 1:36 pm Reply with quote

we are lo-fi listeners, with dial-up. (witcheru & mittins)
Back to top View user's profile
Dlinkquint
ubw fanatic
ubw fanatic



Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: manchester,england
Posts: 535

Posted: Sat Feb 12, 2005 3:16 pm Reply with quote

ive got a handle driven dy-namo hooked up to my speak&spell with a wire running to my neighbours telephone line,the faster i turn the higher the quality
oh i also i have broadband which cost's £25.99 which would i guess be about 50 Nz dollars but due to the crappy cheap software i recieved with it,my speak&spell wont work with it Sad
Back to top View user's profile
ImL
moderator



Joined: Jun 25, 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1885

Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 6:32 am Reply with quote

Dlinkquint wrote:
ive got a handle driven dy-namo hooked up to my speak&spell with a wire running to my neighbours telephone line,the faster i turn the higher the quality
oh i also i have broadband which cost's £25.99 which would i guess be about 50 Nz dollars but due to the crappy cheap software i recieved with it,my speak&spell wont work with it Sad


Shocked you've got speak&spell?? ! ! yeehooo!!!
ouch! 26 pounds = approx. NZ$70.00

Ron wrote:
I think the difference in lo-fi is attributable to the quality of the master and the bit-rate..

If the master is good, then even 24kpbs will sound good, if not, then 48kbps is probably better...


Makes good sense. I over looked the bitrate when uploading last 2 songs, and thanks to Unproject who spotted it, have since increased it.

thanks for all your replies
Back to top View user's profileSend e-mail
Dlinkquint
ubw fanatic
ubw fanatic



Joined: Nov 21, 2004
Location: manchester,england
Posts: 535

Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 9:38 am Reply with quote

if i use wavelab to convert to 64kbps(whatevea) bit rate.it sounds a better conversion than alot of the 128's i hear,some progs convert badly
Back to top View user's profile
smili
moderator



Joined: Sep 11, 2004
Location: Nashville TN
Posts: 1223

Posted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 12:54 pm Reply with quote

I think mono lofi sounds much better than stereo at same bitrate. seems to me the stereo only makes sense at higher bitrates and for lofi it makes sense to put the limited bit depth to work into a mono signal. Not sure if this is generally accepted to be true though?

smili
Back to top View user's profile
Post new topic Reply to topic